Hi Harry,

On 7/16/2026 2:41 AM, Harry van Haaren wrote:
> From: Harry van Haaren <[email protected]>
> 
> Hi Qemu-Dev & CCs,
> 
> This is my first contribution to QEMU itself, but I have worked on
> DPDK, OVS, and QEMU-RS a bit in the past. I have experience with
> mailing lists for patches and some QEMU internals.
> 
> This is a "git publish" reply to the original patches that weren't in a 
> patchset:

When sending new version, you should not reply to v1 series, but send a
proper new thread. Not sure if you added some extra parameters to
git-publish, but it should not be needed.

No need to resend that now, but just an information for your future
series :).

> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/qemu-devel/patch/[email protected]/
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/qemu-devel/patch/[email protected]/
> 
> Thanks for reviews and input, the v2 reworks as follows:
> - I expect email to no longer have "| OPENCHIP" in my name, and the email 
> footer removed
> - git publish used to send, with "--number 2" to hopefully get a v2 patchset 
> out
> - rebased to latest branch, atexit() function signatures changed
> - avoid adding mutex for output, rely on QEMUs logging mutex (thanks Pierrick)
> --- use single call to log to avoid line-breaks corrupting output
> 
> Please note that LLMs were used to investigate and fix this bug,
> but all code in this patch has been reviewed by me, and I believe
> it to be a good solution.
> 
> Regards, -Harry
> 
> Harry van Haaren (2):
>   plugins/execlog: fix segfault/race-cond on per-vCPU structures
>   plugins/execlog: fix execlog vcpu_exit execution print loss
> 
>  contrib/plugins/execlog.c | 88 +++++++++++++++++++--------------------
>  1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
> 

Regards,
Pierrick

Reply via email to