On 16 July 2012 18:24, Alexander Graf <ag...@suse.de> wrote:
> On 07/16/2012 05:40 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> Hmm, good point -- unlike the actual program compile, failures
>> due to -Werror inside configure are silent and near-invisible.
>> Maybe we should back out 417c9d72 ?
>
> So how do we deal with the original problem then? The one where the build
> broke for me because the smartcard code got compiled in because configure
> didn't know that it would fail to compile with -Werror?

We could have a specific configure check for "can you include
this header file in a -Werror compilation", I guess?

-- PMM

Reply via email to