On 16 July 2012 18:24, Alexander Graf <ag...@suse.de> wrote: > On 07/16/2012 05:40 PM, Peter Maydell wrote: >> Hmm, good point -- unlike the actual program compile, failures >> due to -Werror inside configure are silent and near-invisible. >> Maybe we should back out 417c9d72 ? > > So how do we deal with the original problem then? The one where the build > broke for me because the smartcard code got compiled in because configure > didn't know that it would fail to compile with -Werror?
We could have a specific configure check for "can you include this header file in a -Werror compilation", I guess? -- PMM