On 16.07.2012, at 20:28, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 16 July 2012 18:24, Alexander Graf <ag...@suse.de> wrote: >> On 07/16/2012 05:40 PM, Peter Maydell wrote: >>> Hmm, good point -- unlike the actual program compile, failures >>> due to -Werror inside configure are silent and near-invisible. >>> Maybe we should back out 417c9d72 ? >> >> So how do we deal with the original problem then? The one where the build >> broke for me because the smartcard code got compiled in because configure >> didn't know that it would fail to compile with -Werror? > > We could have a specific configure check for "can you include > this header file in a -Werror compilation", I guess?
That's what my first patch did. Alex
