On 2026/08/26 10:38 AM, Chinmay Rath wrote:
> From: Shivang Upadhyay <[email protected]>
> 
> Move below instructions to decodetree specification :
> 
>         lsw{i, x},
>         stsw{i, x}                       : X-form
> 
> The changes were verified by validating that the tcg ops generated by
> those instructions remain the same, which were captured with the '-d
> in_asm,op' flag.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Shivang Upadhyay <[email protected]>
> Reviewed-by: Glenn Miles <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Chinmay Rath <[email protected]>
> ---
>  target/ppc/helper.h                        |   6 +-
>  target/ppc/insn32.decode                   |   7 ++
>  target/ppc/mem_helper.c                    |   6 +-
>  target/ppc/translate.c                     | 102 --------------------
>  target/ppc/translate/fixedpoint-impl.c.inc | 103 +++++++++++++++++++++
>  5 files changed, 116 insertions(+), 108 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/target/ppc/helper.h b/target/ppc/helper.h
> index 7e15676122..0e8b96d0ec 100644
> --- a/target/ppc/helper.h
> +++ b/target/ppc/helper.h
> @@ -45,9 +45,9 @@ DEF_HELPER_1(check_tlb_flush_global, void, env)
>  
>  DEF_HELPER_3(lmw, void, env, tl, i32)
>  DEF_HELPER_FLAGS_3(stmw, TCG_CALL_NO_WG, void, env, tl, i32)
> -DEF_HELPER_4(lsw, void, env, tl, i32, i32)
> -DEF_HELPER_5(lswx, void, env, tl, i32, i32, i32)
> -DEF_HELPER_FLAGS_4(stsw, TCG_CALL_NO_WG, void, env, tl, i32, i32)
> +DEF_HELPER_4(LSW, void, env, tl, i32, i32)
> +DEF_HELPER_5(LSWX, void, env, tl, i32, i32, i32)
> +DEF_HELPER_FLAGS_4(STSW, TCG_CALL_NO_WG, void, env, tl, i32, i32)
>  DEF_HELPER_FLAGS_3(DCBZ, TCG_CALL_NO_WG, void, env, tl, int)
>  #ifdef TARGET_PPC64
>  DEF_HELPER_FLAGS_2(DCBZL, TCG_CALL_NO_WG, void, env, tl)
> diff --git a/target/ppc/insn32.decode b/target/ppc/insn32.decode
> index a3973e042d..e7b5d19cde 100644
> --- a/target/ppc/insn32.decode
> +++ b/target/ppc/insn32.decode
> @@ -527,6 +527,13 @@ CREQV           010011 ..... ..... ..... 0100100001 -  @X
>  CRANDC          010011 ..... ..... ..... 0010000001 -  @X
>  CRORC           010011 ..... ..... ..... 0110100001 -  @X
>  
> +# Fixed Point Move Assist Instructions
> +
> +LSWI            011111 ..... ..... ..... 1 001010101 -  @X
> +LSWX            011111 ..... ..... ..... 1 000010101 -  @X
> +STSWI           011111 ..... ..... ..... 1 011010101 -  @X
> +STSWX           011111 ..... ..... ..... 1 010010101 -  @X
> +
>  # Fixed-Point Hash Instructions
>  
>  HASHST          011111 ..... ..... ..... 1011010010 .   @X_DW
> diff --git a/target/ppc/mem_helper.c b/target/ppc/mem_helper.c
> index 95a224e74c..582180cf88 100644
> --- a/target/ppc/mem_helper.c
> +++ b/target/ppc/mem_helper.c
> @@ -190,7 +190,7 @@ static void do_lsw(CPUPPCState *env, target_ulong addr, 
> uint32_t nb,
>      env->gpr[reg] = val;
>  }
>  
> -void helper_lsw(CPUPPCState *env, target_ulong addr,
> +void helper_LSW(CPUPPCState *env, target_ulong addr,
>                  uint32_t nb, uint32_t reg)
>  {
>      do_lsw(env, addr, nb, reg, GETPC());
> @@ -202,7 +202,7 @@ void helper_lsw(CPUPPCState *env, target_ulong addr,
>   * this is valid, but rA won't be loaded.  For now, I'll follow the
>   * spec...
>   */
> -void helper_lswx(CPUPPCState *env, target_ulong addr, uint32_t reg,
> +void helper_LSWX(CPUPPCState *env, target_ulong addr, uint32_t reg,
>                   uint32_t ra, uint32_t rb)
>  {
>      if (likely(xer_bc != 0)) {
> @@ -218,7 +218,7 @@ void helper_lswx(CPUPPCState *env, target_ulong addr, 
> uint32_t reg,
>      }
>  }
>  
> -void helper_stsw(CPUPPCState *env, target_ulong addr, uint32_t nb,
> +void helper_STSW(CPUPPCState *env, target_ulong addr, uint32_t nb,
>                   uint32_t reg)
>  {
>      uintptr_t raddr = GETPC();
> diff --git a/target/ppc/translate.c b/target/ppc/translate.c
> index e40841b68e..712990cf2d 100644
> --- a/target/ppc/translate.c
> +++ b/target/ppc/translate.c
> @@ -2595,104 +2595,6 @@ static void gen_stmw(DisasContext *ctx)
>      gen_helper_stmw(tcg_env, t0, t1);
>  }
>  
> -/***                    Integer load and store strings                     
> ***/
> -
> -/* lswi */
> -/*
> - * PowerPC32 specification says we must generate an exception if rA is
> - * in the range of registers to be loaded.  In an other hand, IBM says
> - * this is valid, but rA won't be loaded.  For now, I'll follow the
> - * spec...
> - */
> -static void gen_lswi(DisasContext *ctx)
> -{
> -    TCGv t0;
> -    TCGv_i32 t1, t2;
> -    int nb = NB(ctx->opcode);
> -    int start = rD(ctx->opcode);
> -    int ra = rA(ctx->opcode);
> -    int nr;
> -
> -    if (ctx->le_mode) {
> -        gen_align_no_le(ctx);
> -        return;
> -    }
> -    if (nb == 0) {
> -        nb = 32;
> -    }
> -    nr = DIV_ROUND_UP(nb, 4);
> -    if (unlikely(lsw_reg_in_range(start, nr, ra))) {
> -        gen_inval_exception(ctx, POWERPC_EXCP_INVAL_LSWX);
> -        return;
> -    }
> -    gen_set_access_type(ctx, ACCESS_INT);
> -    t0 = tcg_temp_new();
> -    gen_addr_register(ctx, t0);
> -    t1 = tcg_constant_i32(nb);
> -    t2 = tcg_constant_i32(start);
> -    gen_helper_lsw(tcg_env, t0, t1, t2);
> -}
> -
> -/* lswx */
> -static void gen_lswx(DisasContext *ctx)
> -{
> -    TCGv t0;
> -    TCGv_i32 t1, t2, t3;
> -
> -    if (ctx->le_mode) {
> -        gen_align_no_le(ctx);
> -        return;
> -    }
> -    gen_set_access_type(ctx, ACCESS_INT);
> -    t0 = tcg_temp_new();
> -    gen_addr_reg_index(ctx, t0);
> -    t1 = tcg_constant_i32(rD(ctx->opcode));
> -    t2 = tcg_constant_i32(rA(ctx->opcode));
> -    t3 = tcg_constant_i32(rB(ctx->opcode));
> -    gen_helper_lswx(tcg_env, t0, t1, t2, t3);
> -}
> -
> -/* stswi */
> -static void gen_stswi(DisasContext *ctx)
> -{
> -    TCGv t0;
> -    TCGv_i32 t1, t2;
> -    int nb = NB(ctx->opcode);
> -
> -    if (ctx->le_mode) {
> -        gen_align_no_le(ctx);
> -        return;
> -    }
> -    gen_set_access_type(ctx, ACCESS_INT);
> -    t0 = tcg_temp_new();
> -    gen_addr_register(ctx, t0);
> -    if (nb == 0) {
> -        nb = 32;
> -    }
> -    t1 = tcg_constant_i32(nb);
> -    t2 = tcg_constant_i32(rS(ctx->opcode));
> -    gen_helper_stsw(tcg_env, t0, t1, t2);
> -}
> -
> -/* stswx */
> -static void gen_stswx(DisasContext *ctx)
> -{
> -    TCGv t0;
> -    TCGv_i32 t1, t2;
> -
> -    if (ctx->le_mode) {
> -        gen_align_no_le(ctx);
> -        return;
> -    }
> -    gen_set_access_type(ctx, ACCESS_INT);
> -    t0 = tcg_temp_new();
> -    gen_addr_reg_index(ctx, t0);
> -    t1 = tcg_temp_new_i32();
> -    tcg_gen_trunc_tl_i32(t1, cpu_xer);
> -    tcg_gen_andi_i32(t1, t1, 0x7F);
> -    t2 = tcg_constant_i32(rS(ctx->opcode));
> -    gen_helper_stsw(tcg_env, t0, t1, t2);
> -}
>  
>  #if !defined(CONFIG_USER_ONLY)
>  static inline void gen_check_tlb_flush(DisasContext *ctx, bool global)
> @@ -4914,10 +4816,6 @@ GEN_HANDLER_E(dform39, 0x39, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0x00000000, 
> PPC_NONE, PPC2_ISA205),
>  GEN_HANDLER_E(dform3D, 0x3D, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0x00000000, PPC_NONE, PPC2_ISA205),
>  GEN_HANDLER(lmw, 0x2E, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0x00000000, PPC_INTEGER),
>  GEN_HANDLER(stmw, 0x2F, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0x00000000, PPC_INTEGER),
> -GEN_HANDLER(lswi, 0x1F, 0x15, 0x12, 0x00000001, PPC_STRING),
> -GEN_HANDLER(lswx, 0x1F, 0x15, 0x10, 0x00000001, PPC_STRING),
> -GEN_HANDLER(stswi, 0x1F, 0x15, 0x16, 0x00000001, PPC_STRING),
> -GEN_HANDLER(stswx, 0x1F, 0x15, 0x14, 0x00000001, PPC_STRING),
>  /* ISA v3.0 changed the extended opcode from 62 to 30 */
>  GEN_HANDLER(rfi, 0x13, 0x12, 0x01, 0x03FF8001, PPC_FLOW),
>  #if defined(TARGET_PPC64)
> diff --git a/target/ppc/translate/fixedpoint-impl.c.inc 
> b/target/ppc/translate/fixedpoint-impl.c.inc
> index 26b308e435..82fb645279 100644
> --- a/target/ppc/translate/fixedpoint-impl.c.inc
> +++ b/target/ppc/translate/fixedpoint-impl.c.inc
> @@ -585,6 +585,109 @@ TRANS(CRANDC, cr_logic_common, tcg_gen_andc_i32);
>  TRANS(CREQV, cr_logic_common, tcg_gen_eqv_i32);
>  TRANS(CRORC, cr_logic_common, tcg_gen_orc_i32);
>  
> +

This is extra blank line. Please remove.

> +/***                    Integer load and store strings                     
> ***/

This banner-comment might not needed. But don't have any strong feelings
about it.

> +
> +/* lswi */
> +static bool trans_LSWI(DisasContext *ctx, arg_LSWI *a)
> +{
> +    TCGv t0;
> +    TCGv_i32 t1, t2;
> +    int nb = a->rb;
> +    int start = a->rt;
> +    int ra = a->ra;
> +    int nr;
> +
> +    REQUIRE_INSNS_FLAGS(ctx, STRING);
> +    if (ctx->le_mode) {
> +        gen_align_no_le(ctx);
> +        return true;
> +    }
> +    if (nb == 0) {
> +        nb = 32;
> +    }
> +    nr = DIV_ROUND_UP(nb, 4);
> +    if (unlikely(lsw_reg_in_range(start, nr, ra))) {
> +        gen_inval_exception(ctx, POWERPC_EXCP_INVAL_LSWX);
> +        return true;
> +    }
> +    gen_set_access_type(ctx, ACCESS_INT);
> +    t0 = do_ea_calc_ra(ctx, ra);
> +    t1 = tcg_constant_i32(nb);
> +    t2 = tcg_constant_i32(start);
> +    gen_helper_LSW(tcg_env, t0, t1, t2);
> +
> +    return true;
> +}
> +
> +/* lswx */
> +static bool trans_LSWX(DisasContext *ctx, arg_LSWX *a)
> +{
> +    TCGv t0;
> +    TCGv_i32 t1, t2, t3;
> +
> +    REQUIRE_INSNS_FLAGS(ctx, STRING);
> +    if (ctx->le_mode) {
> +        gen_align_no_le(ctx);
> +        return true;
> +    }
> +
> +    gen_set_access_type(ctx, ACCESS_INT);
> +    t0 = do_ea_calc(ctx, a->ra, cpu_gpr[a->rb]);
> +    t1 = tcg_constant_i32(a->rt);
> +    t2 = tcg_constant_i32(a->ra);
> +    t3 = tcg_constant_i32(a->rb);
> +    gen_helper_LSWX(tcg_env, t0, t1, t2, t3);
> +
> +    return true;
> +}
> +
> +/* stswi */
> +static bool trans_STSWI(DisasContext *ctx, arg_STSWI *a)
> +{
> +    TCGv t0;
> +    TCGv_i32 t1, t2;
> +    int nb = a->rb;
> +
> +    REQUIRE_INSNS_FLAGS(ctx, STRING);
> +    if (ctx->le_mode) {
> +        gen_align_no_le(ctx);
> +        return true;
> +    }
> +    gen_set_access_type(ctx, ACCESS_INT);
> +    t0 = do_ea_calc_ra(ctx, a->ra);
> +    if (nb == 0) {
> +        nb = 32;
> +    }
> +    t1 = tcg_constant_i32(nb);
> +    t2 = tcg_constant_i32(a->rt);
> +    gen_helper_STSW(tcg_env, t0, t1, t2);
> +
> +    return true;
> +}
> +
> +/* stswx */
> +static bool trans_STSWX(DisasContext *ctx, arg_STSWX *a)
> +{
> +    TCGv t0;
> +    TCGv_i32 t1, t2;
> +
> +    REQUIRE_INSNS_FLAGS(ctx, STRING);
> +    if (ctx->le_mode) {
> +        gen_align_no_le(ctx);
> +        return true;
> +    }
> +    gen_set_access_type(ctx, ACCESS_INT);
> +    t0 = do_ea_calc_ra(ctx, a->ra);

STSWX is X-form indexed. As per Power ISA:

  EA ← (RA=0 ? 0 : (RA)) + (RB)

do_ea_calc_ra only computes (RA=0 ? 0 : GPR[RA]) — GPR[RB] is never
added. Any stswx with a non-zero RB will store to the wrong address.

The old gen_stswx correctly called gen_addr_reg_index() which includes
the RB addition. trans_LSWX (three functions above) also gets this
right. Fix:

-    t0 = do_ea_calc_ra(ctx, a->ra);
+    t0 = do_ea_calc(ctx, a->ra, cpu_gpr[a->rb]);

Note: do_ea_calc_ra is correct for trans_LSWI and trans_STSWI because
those are the immediate forms — their ISA EA is also (RA==0 ? 0 :
GPR[RA]) with no RB term; the RB field carries NB, not a register EA
operand.

> +    t1 = tcg_temp_new_i32();
> +    tcg_gen_trunc_tl_i32(t1, cpu_xer);
> +    tcg_gen_andi_i32(t1, t1, 0x7F);
> +    t2 = tcg_constant_i32(a->rt);
> +    gen_helper_STSW(tcg_env, t0, t1, t2);
> +
> +    return true;
> +}
> +
>  static bool do_add_D(DisasContext *ctx, arg_D *a, bool add_ca, bool 
> compute_ca,
>                       bool compute_ov, bool compute_rc0)
>  {
> -- 
> 2.55.0
> 

Reply via email to