Hi,

On Mon, Aug 31, 2026 at 2:06 AM Joel Stanley <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 18 Aug 2026 at 00:13, Anirudh Srinivasan
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Atlantis has 4 PRCMs that are visible from S mode by the Ascalon Core
> > (RCPU, HSIO, PCIe and MM). This commit adds these 4 PRCM blocks to the
> > tt-atlantis model, along with necessary device tree nodes for them.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Chao Liu <[email protected]>
> > Signed-off-by: Anirudh Srinivasan <[email protected]>
> > ---
> >  docs/system/riscv/tt_atlantis.rst |  1 +
> >  hw/riscv/tt_atlantis.c            | 94 
> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  include/hw/riscv/tt_atlantis.h    | 19 ++++++++
> >  3 files changed, 114 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/docs/system/riscv/tt_atlantis.rst 
> > b/docs/system/riscv/tt_atlantis.rst
> > index 1f2880d617..539c22354f 100644
> > --- a/docs/system/riscv/tt_atlantis.rst
> > +++ b/docs/system/riscv/tt_atlantis.rst
> > @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ tt-atlantis QEMU model features
> >  * 8-core Ascalon-X CPU Cluster
> >  * RISC-V compliant Advanced Interrupt Architecture
> >  * 16550A compatible UART
> > +* 4 PRCMs (Clock and Reset Controllers)
> >
> >  Known limitations
> >  -----------------
> > diff --git a/hw/riscv/tt_atlantis.c b/hw/riscv/tt_atlantis.c
> > index d808bcc11c..9ebba07703 100644
> > --- a/hw/riscv/tt_atlantis.c
> > +++ b/hw/riscv/tt_atlantis.c
> > @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
> >  #include "hw/char/serial-mm.h"
> >  #include "hw/intc/riscv_aclint.h"
> >  #include "hw/misc/unimp.h"
> > +#include "hw/misc/tt_atlantis_prcm.h"
> >
> >  #include "system/system.h"
> >  #include "system/device_tree.h"
> > @@ -59,6 +60,10 @@ static const MemMapEntry tt_atlantis_memmap[] = {
> >      [TT_ATL_I2C3] =             { 0xd4070000,       0x10000 },
> >      [TT_ATL_I2C4] =             { 0xd4080000,       0x10000 },
> >      [TT_ATL_UART1] =            { 0xd4110000,       0x10000 },
> > +    [TT_ATL_PRCM_RCPU] =        { 0xd0000000,       0x10000 },
> > +    [TT_ATL_PRCM_PCIE] =        { 0xd8000000,         0x100 },
> > +    [TT_ATL_PRCM_MM] =          { 0xdc000000,        0x1000 },
> > +    [TT_ATL_PRCM_HSIO] =        { 0xe00c0000,         0x510 },
> >      [TT_ATL_SAPLIC] =           { 0xe8000000,     0x4000000 },
> >      [TT_ATL_DDR_HI] =          { 0x100000000,  0x1000000000 },
> >  };
> > @@ -328,11 +333,35 @@ static void create_fdt_i2c_device(TTAtlantisState *s, 
> > int bus,
> >      qemu_fdt_setprop_cell(fdt, name, "reg", addr);
> >  }
> >
> > +static char *create_fdt_prcm(void *fdt, const MemMapEntry *mem,
> > +                             const char *prcm_name)
> > +{
> > +    hwaddr base = mem->base;
> > +    hwaddr size = mem->size;
> > +    char *name = g_strdup_printf("/soc/prcm_%s@%" PRIx64,
> > +                                 prcm_name, mem->base);
>
> Use the locals, or drop them and use mem->base both times.
>
> > +    g_autofree char *compatible =
> > +        g_strdup_printf("tenstorrent,atlantis-prcm-%s", prcm_name);
> > +
> > +    qemu_fdt_add_subnode(fdt, name);
> > +    qemu_fdt_setprop_string(fdt, name, "compatible", compatible);
> > +    qemu_fdt_setprop_sized_cells(fdt, name, "reg", 2, base, 2, size);
> > +    qemu_fdt_setprop_cell(fdt, name, "#address-cells", 1);
> > +    qemu_fdt_setprop_cell(fdt, name, "#size-cells", 0);
> > +    qemu_fdt_setprop_cell(fdt, name, "#clock-cells", 1);
> > +    qemu_fdt_setprop_cell(fdt, name, "#reset-cells", 1);
> > +    qemu_fdt_setprop_cell(fdt, name, "phandle", next_phandle());
>
> If a phandle falls in the woods and nobody...
>
> If you're not saving this value anywhere, is there any need to set one?

Doesn't seem to work if I remove next_phandle(). I get an error at the
qemu_fdt_get_phandle call below like this

qemu-system-riscv64: qemu_fdt_get_phandle: Couldn't get phandle for
/soc/prcm_rcpu@d0000000: <no error>

I think the correct solution would be to use qemu_fdt_alloc_phandle
instead here. That seems to work.

>
> > +
> > +    return name;
> > +}
> > +
> >  static void finalize_fdt(TTAtlantisState *s)
> >  {
> >      uint32_t aplic_s_phandle = next_phandle();
> >      uint32_t imsic_s_phandle = next_phandle();
> >      uint32_t periph_clk_phandle = next_phandle();
> > +    uint32_t osc_24m_phandle = next_phandle();
> > +    uint32_t prcm_rcpu_phandle;
> >      void *fdt = MACHINE(s)->fdt;
> >
> >      create_fdt_cpu(s, s->memmap, aplic_s_phandle, imsic_s_phandle);
> > @@ -348,6 +377,34 @@ static void finalize_fdt(TTAtlantisState *s)
> >                      aplic_s_phandle);
> >
> >      create_fdt_clk(fdt, "periph-clk", 100000000, periph_clk_phandle);
> > +    create_fdt_clk(fdt, "osc_24m", 24000000, osc_24m_phandle);
>
> With the PRCM enabled the UART and I2C can get a real clock? So we can
> drop the periph-clk node and modify create_fdt_i2c as well as
> create_fdt_uart to use the real PRCM phandles. This will shake out any
> issues with how you're wiring up the device tree too.

Updated.

>
> > +
> > +    g_autofree char *rcpu_name = create_fdt_prcm(fdt,
> > +        &s->memmap[TT_ATL_PRCM_RCPU], "rcpu");
> > +    prcm_rcpu_phandle = qemu_fdt_get_phandle(fdt, rcpu_name);
>
> This is a great function that I didn't know of when I wrote
> next_phandle(). I'm all for using it, but lets swap the entire file
> over at once.

I would like to keep this series limited to adding the PRCM, this
cleanup can be done in a subsequent series.

>
> > +    qemu_fdt_setprop_cells(fdt, rcpu_name, "clocks", osc_24m_phandle);
> > +    qemu_fdt_setprop_cells(fdt, rcpu_name, "assigned-clocks",
> > +                           prcm_rcpu_phandle, TT_ATL_CLK_RCPU_ROOT,
> > +                           prcm_rcpu_phandle, TT_ATL_CLK_NOCC_CLK);
> > +    qemu_fdt_setprop_cells(fdt, rcpu_name, "assigned-clock-parents",
> > +                           prcm_rcpu_phandle, TT_ATL_CLK_RCPU_PLL,
> > +                           prcm_rcpu_phandle, TT_ATL_CLK_NOC_PLL);
>
> > @@ -545,6 +602,43 @@ static void tt_atlantis_machine_init(MachineState 
> > *machine)
> >      serial_mm_init(system_memory, s->memmap[TT_ATL_UART1].base, 2,
> >                     qdev_get_gpio_in(s->irqchip, TT_ATL_UART1_IRQ),
> >                     115200, serial_hd(0), DEVICE_LITTLE_ENDIAN);
> > +
> > +    /* Add rcpu prcm block */
> > +    object_initialize_child(OBJECT(s), "prcm-rcpu", &s->prcm[0],
> > +                            TYPE_TT_ATLANTIS_PRCM_RCPU);
> > +    sysbus_realize(SYS_BUS_DEVICE(&s->prcm[0]), &error_fatal);
> > +    memory_region_add_subregion(system_memory,
>
> Since you're already sending a v3, can you rebase it on this series please:
>
>  https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-riscv/[email protected]/
>
> Aside from code shuffling, you will pass s->memory to
> memory_region_add_subregion, the _realize calls go in
> tt_atlantis_soc_realize, and the initalise calls go in
> tt_atlantis_soc_init.

Will do.

>
> > +                                s->memmap[TT_ATL_PRCM_RCPU].base,
> > +                                sysbus_mmio_get_region(
> > +                                    SYS_BUS_DEVICE(&s->prcm[0]), 0));
> > +
>
> > diff --git a/include/hw/riscv/tt_atlantis.h b/include/hw/riscv/tt_atlantis.h
> > index 7f7d4a5a59..20bcdfeb52 100644
> > --- a/include/hw/riscv/tt_atlantis.h
> > +++ b/include/hw/riscv/tt_atlantis.h
>
> > @@ -59,6 +62,22 @@ enum {
> >      TT_ATL_SAPLIC,
> >      TT_ATL_SIMSIC,
> >      TT_ATL_UART1,
> > +    TT_ATL_PRCM_RCPU,
> > +    TT_ATL_PRCM_HSIO,
> > +    TT_ATL_PRCM_PCIE,
> > +    TT_ATL_PRCM_MM,
> > +};
> > +
> > +/* RCPU PRCM Clock IDs */
>
> Do these come from
> include/dt-bindings/clock/tenstorrent,atlantis-prcm-rcpu.h in linux?
> Add a comment.

Yes.



>
> > +enum {
> > +    TT_ATL_CLK_RCPU_PLL = 0,
> > +    TT_ATL_CLK_RCPU_ROOT = 1,
> > +    TT_ATL_CLK_NOC_PLL = 25,
> > +    TT_ATL_CLK_NOCC_CLK = 26,
> > +    TT_ATL_CLK_HSIO_PLL = 54,
> > +    TT_ATL_CLK_PCIE_PLL = 55,
> > +    TT_ATL_CLK_MM_PLL0 = 56,
> > +    TT_ATL_CLK_MM_PLL1 = 57,
> >  };
> >
> >  #endif
> >
> > --
> > 2.43.0
> >

Reply via email to