On 8/31/2026 4:06 AM, Joel Stanley wrote:
On Tue, 18 Aug 2026 at 00:13, Anirudh Srinivasan
<[email protected]> wrote:

Atlantis has 4 PRCMs that are visible from S mode by the Ascalon Core
(RCPU, HSIO, PCIe and MM). This commit adds these 4 PRCM blocks to the
tt-atlantis model, along with necessary device tree nodes for them.

Reviewed-by: Chao Liu <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Anirudh Srinivasan <[email protected]>
---
  docs/system/riscv/tt_atlantis.rst |  1 +
  hw/riscv/tt_atlantis.c            | 94 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  include/hw/riscv/tt_atlantis.h    | 19 ++++++++
  3 files changed, 114 insertions(+)

diff --git a/docs/system/riscv/tt_atlantis.rst 
b/docs/system/riscv/tt_atlantis.rst
index 1f2880d617..539c22354f 100644
--- a/docs/system/riscv/tt_atlantis.rst
+++ b/docs/system/riscv/tt_atlantis.rst
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ tt-atlantis QEMU model features
  * 8-core Ascalon-X CPU Cluster
  * RISC-V compliant Advanced Interrupt Architecture
  * 16550A compatible UART
+* 4 PRCMs (Clock and Reset Controllers)

  Known limitations
  -----------------
diff --git a/hw/riscv/tt_atlantis.c b/hw/riscv/tt_atlantis.c
index d808bcc11c..9ebba07703 100644
--- a/hw/riscv/tt_atlantis.c
+++ b/hw/riscv/tt_atlantis.c
@@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
  #include "hw/char/serial-mm.h"
  #include "hw/intc/riscv_aclint.h"
  #include "hw/misc/unimp.h"
+#include "hw/misc/tt_atlantis_prcm.h"

  #include "system/system.h"
  #include "system/device_tree.h"
@@ -59,6 +60,10 @@ static const MemMapEntry tt_atlantis_memmap[] = {
      [TT_ATL_I2C3] =             { 0xd4070000,       0x10000 },
      [TT_ATL_I2C4] =             { 0xd4080000,       0x10000 },
      [TT_ATL_UART1] =            { 0xd4110000,       0x10000 },
+    [TT_ATL_PRCM_RCPU] =        { 0xd0000000,       0x10000 },
+    [TT_ATL_PRCM_PCIE] =        { 0xd8000000,         0x100 },
+    [TT_ATL_PRCM_MM] =          { 0xdc000000,        0x1000 },
+    [TT_ATL_PRCM_HSIO] =        { 0xe00c0000,         0x510 },
      [TT_ATL_SAPLIC] =           { 0xe8000000,     0x4000000 },
      [TT_ATL_DDR_HI] =          { 0x100000000,  0x1000000000 },
  };
@@ -328,11 +333,35 @@ static void create_fdt_i2c_device(TTAtlantisState *s, int 
bus,
      qemu_fdt_setprop_cell(fdt, name, "reg", addr);
  }

+static char *create_fdt_prcm(void *fdt, const MemMapEntry *mem,
+                             const char *prcm_name)
+{
+    hwaddr base = mem->base;
+    hwaddr size = mem->size;
+    char *name = g_strdup_printf("/soc/prcm_%s@%" PRIx64,
+                                 prcm_name, mem->base);

Use the locals, or drop them and use mem->base both times.

+    g_autofree char *compatible =
+        g_strdup_printf("tenstorrent,atlantis-prcm-%s", prcm_name);
+
+    qemu_fdt_add_subnode(fdt, name);
+    qemu_fdt_setprop_string(fdt, name, "compatible", compatible);
+    qemu_fdt_setprop_sized_cells(fdt, name, "reg", 2, base, 2, size);
+    qemu_fdt_setprop_cell(fdt, name, "#address-cells", 1);
+    qemu_fdt_setprop_cell(fdt, name, "#size-cells", 0);
+    qemu_fdt_setprop_cell(fdt, name, "#clock-cells", 1);
+    qemu_fdt_setprop_cell(fdt, name, "#reset-cells", 1);
+    qemu_fdt_setprop_cell(fdt, name, "phandle", next_phandle());

If a phandle falls in the woods and nobody...

If you're not saving this value anywhere, is there any need to set one?

The code is retrieving this value down below:

>> +    g_autofree char *rcpu_name = create_fdt_prcm(fdt,
>> +        &s->memmap[TT_ATL_PRCM_RCPU], "rcpu");
>> +    prcm_rcpu_phandle = qemu_fdt_get_phandle(fdt, rcpu_name);


This is a suggestion I made in v1 to avoid having to carry a pre-generated
phandle value when one can be autogenerated when needed.

Note that this suggestion was made before "next_phandle()" was introduced.


+
+    return name;
+}
+
  static void finalize_fdt(TTAtlantisState *s)
  {
      uint32_t aplic_s_phandle = next_phandle();
      uint32_t imsic_s_phandle = next_phandle();
      uint32_t periph_clk_phandle = next_phandle();
+    uint32_t osc_24m_phandle = next_phandle();
+    uint32_t prcm_rcpu_phandle;
      void *fdt = MACHINE(s)->fdt;

      create_fdt_cpu(s, s->memmap, aplic_s_phandle, imsic_s_phandle);
@@ -348,6 +377,34 @@ static void finalize_fdt(TTAtlantisState *s)
                      aplic_s_phandle);

      create_fdt_clk(fdt, "periph-clk", 100000000, periph_clk_phandle);
+    create_fdt_clk(fdt, "osc_24m", 24000000, osc_24m_phandle);

With the PRCM enabled the UART and I2C can get a real clock? So we can
drop the periph-clk node and modify create_fdt_i2c as well as
create_fdt_uart to use the real PRCM phandles. This will shake out any
issues with how you're wiring up the device tree too.

+
+    g_autofree char *rcpu_name = create_fdt_prcm(fdt,
+        &s->memmap[TT_ATL_PRCM_RCPU], "rcpu");
+    prcm_rcpu_phandle = qemu_fdt_get_phandle(fdt, rcpu_name);

This is a great function that I didn't know of when I wrote
next_phandle(). I'm all for using it, but lets swap the entire file
over at once.

They're not the same thing though.  qemu_fdt_get_phandle(fdt, nodename)
retrieves the already assigned phandle value for nodename.  It doesn't do
the same as next_phandle().  I believe you're thinking about
qemu_fdt_alloc_phandle(fdt) instead.

And yes, ideally the board would either do the phandle management by its own,
i.e. what next_phandle() is doing and what other boards like 'virt' do, or
rely on alloc_phandle + get_phandle.  Mixing and matching them can work as
long as you're doing alloc_phandle last - otherwise the manual phandle
counter can collide with alloc_phandle.


Thanks,
Daniel




+    qemu_fdt_setprop_cells(fdt, rcpu_name, "clocks", osc_24m_phandle);
+    qemu_fdt_setprop_cells(fdt, rcpu_name, "assigned-clocks",
+                           prcm_rcpu_phandle, TT_ATL_CLK_RCPU_ROOT,
+                           prcm_rcpu_phandle, TT_ATL_CLK_NOCC_CLK);
+    qemu_fdt_setprop_cells(fdt, rcpu_name, "assigned-clock-parents",
+                           prcm_rcpu_phandle, TT_ATL_CLK_RCPU_PLL,
+                           prcm_rcpu_phandle, TT_ATL_CLK_NOC_PLL);

@@ -545,6 +602,43 @@ static void tt_atlantis_machine_init(MachineState *machine)
      serial_mm_init(system_memory, s->memmap[TT_ATL_UART1].base, 2,
                     qdev_get_gpio_in(s->irqchip, TT_ATL_UART1_IRQ),
                     115200, serial_hd(0), DEVICE_LITTLE_ENDIAN);
+
+    /* Add rcpu prcm block */
+    object_initialize_child(OBJECT(s), "prcm-rcpu", &s->prcm[0],
+                            TYPE_TT_ATLANTIS_PRCM_RCPU);
+    sysbus_realize(SYS_BUS_DEVICE(&s->prcm[0]), &error_fatal);
+    memory_region_add_subregion(system_memory,

Since you're already sending a v3, can you rebase it on this series please:

  https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-riscv/[email protected]/

Aside from code shuffling, you will pass s->memory to
memory_region_add_subregion, the _realize calls go in
tt_atlantis_soc_realize, and the initalise calls go in
tt_atlantis_soc_init.

+                                s->memmap[TT_ATL_PRCM_RCPU].base,
+                                sysbus_mmio_get_region(
+                                    SYS_BUS_DEVICE(&s->prcm[0]), 0));
+

diff --git a/include/hw/riscv/tt_atlantis.h b/include/hw/riscv/tt_atlantis.h
index 7f7d4a5a59..20bcdfeb52 100644
--- a/include/hw/riscv/tt_atlantis.h
+++ b/include/hw/riscv/tt_atlantis.h

@@ -59,6 +62,22 @@ enum {
      TT_ATL_SAPLIC,
      TT_ATL_SIMSIC,
      TT_ATL_UART1,
+    TT_ATL_PRCM_RCPU,
+    TT_ATL_PRCM_HSIO,
+    TT_ATL_PRCM_PCIE,
+    TT_ATL_PRCM_MM,
+};
+
+/* RCPU PRCM Clock IDs */

Do these come from
include/dt-bindings/clock/tenstorrent,atlantis-prcm-rcpu.h in linux?
Add a comment.

+enum {
+    TT_ATL_CLK_RCPU_PLL = 0,
+    TT_ATL_CLK_RCPU_ROOT = 1,
+    TT_ATL_CLK_NOC_PLL = 25,
+    TT_ATL_CLK_NOCC_CLK = 26,
+    TT_ATL_CLK_HSIO_PLL = 54,
+    TT_ATL_CLK_PCIE_PLL = 55,
+    TT_ATL_CLK_MM_PLL0 = 56,
+    TT_ATL_CLK_MM_PLL1 = 57,
  };

  #endif

--
2.43.0



Reply via email to