On 9/13/26 23:16, Peter Maydell wrote:
On Thu, 6 Aug 2026 at 18:32, Richard Henderson
<[email protected]> wrote:
It is IMPLEMENTATION DEFINED whether HCR_EL2.TID3 traps on registers
within the range which are not explicitly listed. Previously we chose
not to honor the TID3 bit.
However, with FEAT_IDTE3 it becomes mandatory to honor SCR_EL3.TID3
on these registers, so we might as well honor HCR_EL2.TID3 too.
I thought we agreed not to change the behaviour here? Is this
just a "forgot to update commit message" thing?
Oh, yes. Because I did update the code to test for v8 in translate.c.
r~
