On 22.09.26 15:52, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 22.09.2026 um 15:44 hat Alberto Garcia geschrieben:
On Tue 22 Sep 2026 03:03:56 PM +02, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 21.09.2026 um 22:42 hat Stefan Hajnoczi geschrieben:
On Wed, Sep 16, 2026 at 10:21:22AM +0200, Hanna Czenczek wrote:
What's even stranger is that both things were introduced in the same
commit. But it seems clearly related to 136 because the change was made
right before the test was added.
Berto, do you remember why you didn't rely just on clock_step?
No, sorry, I don't remember :-/ I guess I wasn't familiar with that
function? 136 was one of the first tests that I wrote.
I thought so at first, too, but then I saw that other places in the same
test do use it.
Anyway, thanks for the quick reply. Then let's just try out what breaks
if we change it. :-)
Yup, I’ll take a look.
(Thanks for chiming in, Berto!)
Hanna
