Il mer 30 set 2026, 15:09 Daniel P. Berrangé <[email protected]> ha scritto:
> > > + AI-used-for: tests, docs > > > + AI-used-for: code > > > + AI-used-for: code (refactoring) > > > + AI-used-for: code (prototype) > > > + AI-used-for: research > > Do we really want to include that last one "research" ? In that scenario > the AI agent is not directly authoring code, so nothing in the commit can > be directly attributed to the AI. > I don't recall specifically where it was brought up... Perhaps something separate from "code" makes sense for extremely small fixes but I agree that "research" is not interesting anymore, given the meaning that is attached to the trailer since this version. I'm not convinced "AI-used-for: research" has any real value other than > to demonstrate how much you personally rely on AI, and I don't think > the projects needs to care/ask about that. > Maybe it was intended for patches attached to security reports or something like that. It can go though. > > +``AI-used-for`` should not be included for "background" usage such as > > > +autocomplete or obtaining a pre-review of the patch. > > I'd be stronger and say "AI-used-for" only be used where some part of > the patch *content* was authored by the AI. > Yep. Paolo
