Am 05.10.2026 um 23:09 hat BALATON Zoltan geschrieben: > On Fri, 2 Oct 2026, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > I agree completely with how you phrased the first and third. I agree > > that the second bullet is a risk too, but it's mitigated by "LLM-created > > contributions will be held to a higher standard than human-created ones, > > because LLMs make it easier to write tests" (and by maintainers being > > able to > > Tests need to be reviewed too to be able to trust them so that does not help > against overloading reviewers with generated patches but burdens them even > more: they will also have to review the tests before the code.
The required level of trust for tests is comparatively low, so it's much easier to review tests to a sufficient level than say device emulation code. If a new test looks plausible, fails before the fix and passes afterwards, it's more useful that what we had before, even if it's technically buggy in some corner case. Kevin
