On 10/7/26 12:29, Alex Bennée wrote: > > Hi, > > The KVM/QEMU community call is at: > > https://meet.jit.si/kvmcallmeeting > @ > 13/10/2026 14:00 UTC > > I would like to propose a discussion that came out of Core Collective's > QEMU sub-group [1]: > > - Memory port interfaces for co-simulation > - Dynamic machines / data driven machines > > This was discussed in relation to recent proposals to upstream some of > the features from the Xilinx downstream fork: > > From: Ruslan Ruslichenko <[email protected]> > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2026 18:00:24 +0200 > Subject: [PATCH v2 00/20] hw/core: Introduce Remote Port Co-simulation > Protocol > From: Ruslan Ruslichenko <[email protected]> > > There is also a wider meta-question of where the best place to > co-ordinate engineering (and potentially funding) for these sort of > features is. Obviously CoreCollective is already a place to do this for > companies in the Arm eco-system but features that support co-simulation > are hopefully of interest to a number of the architectures. > > Are there any other agenda items for the sync-up? >
Is this also for topics related to KVM but not necessarily QEMU? If so, and if there will be people who are familiar with device passthrough, I'd like to discuss whether IOMMU faults and KVM MMU faults are recoverable. There is a virtio device I am working on which requires this to avoid either crashing the guest or allowing the guest to hog host memory. -- Sincerely, Demi Marie Obenour (she/her/hers)
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
