Marc-AndrĂ© Lureau <[email protected]> writes:

> Convert all callers of object_property_add() and
> object_class_property_add() that register struct-typed properties with
> QAPI visitor-based getters/setters to use object_property_add_qapi() and
> object_class_property_add_qapi() instead.
>
> This replaces the manual string type name with a reference to the
> generated QAPITypeInfo constant, enabling QMP introspection to report
> accurate QAPI type information for struct properties. Existing
> getters/setters are preserved unchanged.
>
> The cxl-fmw property type is corrected from "CXLFixedMemoryWindow"
> (not a real QAPI type) to "CXLFixedMemoryWindowOptions".
>
> Signed-off-by: Marc-AndrĂ© Lureau <[email protected]>
> ---
>  authz/list.c              |  2 +-
>  block/throttle-groups.c   |  5 +++--
>  chardev/char-socket.c     |  3 ++-
>  hw/core/machine.c         | 11 +++++++----
>  hw/cxl/cxl-host.c         |  4 +++-
>  hw/remote/vfio-user-obj.c |  5 +++--
>  hw/vfio-user/pci.c        |  5 +++--
>  target/i386/cpu.c         | 11 ++++++++---
>  target/i386/kvm/tdx.c     |  4 +++-
>  target/s390x/cpu-system.c |  4 +++-
>  10 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/authz/list.c b/authz/list.c
> index 363b2ee12c98..ed3d346004c2 100644
> --- a/authz/list.c
> +++ b/authz/list.c
> @@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ qauthz_list_class_init(ObjectClass *oc, const void *data)
>          .set = qauthz_list_prop_set_policy,
>      ));
>  
> -    object_class_property_add(oc, "rules", "QAuthZListRule",
> +    object_class_property_add_qapi(oc, "rules", &QAuthZListRule_type_info,
>                                qauthz_list_prop_get_rules,
>                                qauthz_list_prop_set_rules,
>                                NULL, NULL);

docs/devel/style.rst (for what it's worth):

    In case of function, there are several variants:

    * 4 spaces indent from the beginning
    * align the secondary lines just after the opening parenthesis of the first

    For example:

    .. code-block:: c

        do_something(x, y,
            z);

        do_something(x, y,
                     z);

        do_something(x, do_another(y,
                                   z));

Thoughts?

[...]


Reply via email to