Hanna Czenczek <[email protected]> writes: > On 23.10.26 08:14, Markus Armbruster wrote:
[...] >> In sane usage, @delay-report-ns < @delay-stop-ns. Correct? > > Well, uh, I suppose. The opposite could be imagined, but if someone wants > that, that might rather indicate they would really want an array of > thresholds rather than a single one, so… As long as we just have a single > reporting threshold, `@delay-report-ns < @delay-stop-ns` is the sane usage, > yes. Three options, I think: 1. Make @delay-stop-ns < @delay-stop-ns an error. 2. Advice users that @delay-stop-ns < @delay-stop-ns probably makes no sense. 3. Nothing, because we trust users they can figure this out themselves. Entirely up to you! [...]
