On 09/17/2012 11:09 AM, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > If you insist, maybe we can just add a movcond op that uses setcond, so > it makes the code more readable?
Well, that's certainly a good first step. And an easy fall back for hosts that choose not to implement the full conditional move. But at least 4 of our 8 hosts do have a proper cmove insn. But honestly I can't understand the resistance to movcond. r~
