On 22/11/12 13:02, Markus Armbruster wrote: Thanks for the review, Stefan already applied the patch, though. Is there anything that you really want to have a followup patch besides this one?
> There's just one caller that passes IF_DEFAULT. We could change it to > pass machine->block_default_type instead, and drop parameter > block_default_type. Follow-up patch. I will have a look on that. Christian
