On 1/2/08, Paul Brook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Also the opaque parameter may need to be different for each function, > > it just didn't matter for the unassigned memory case. > > Do you really have systems where independent devices need to respond to > different sized accesses to the same address?
I don't think so. But one day unassigned or even normal RAM memory access may need an opaque parameter, so passing the device's opaque to unassigned memory handler is wrong.
