On Thursday 03 January 2008 23:18:58 Paul Brook wrote: > > Well, the measuring I had in mind partly concentrats on TLB misses, page > > faults, etc. (in addition to the cycle measuring). guess i'll have to > > implement something for myself in qemu :-/ > > Be aware that the TLB qemu uses behaves very differently to a real CPU TLB. > If you want to get TLB miss statistics you'll need to model a "real" TLB > for that separately.
Sure, yes. But I don't even care what it would be like on a real CPU. I just want to know the impact it has on the emulated CPU ;-) > Page faults should be straightforward, but any half-decent guest OS would > be able to tell you those anyway. True *g*
