On 23 January 2013 13:38, Andreas Färber <afaer...@suse.de> wrote:
> Am 23.01.2013 14:03, schrieb Peter Maydell:
>> On 23 January 2013 12:07, Andreas Färber <afaer...@suse.de> wrote:
>>> + if (cpu_model == NULL) {
>>> + return NULL;
>>> + }
>>
>> explicit "== NULL" is kind of ugly; established style in
>> target-arm/ is "if (!cpu_model)..."
>
> I consistently use !foo only if foo is bool. Any decent compiler will
> optimize this appropriately.
Yes -- I prefer (!ptr) not because I think the code will be different
but because I think it is better style (and consistent with the
current code -- there are no instances of "== NULL" in target-arm
today).
>> Is this a class method because the plan is that eventually
>> the code that instantiates the CPU object will become
>> generic rather than target specific?
>
> Yes, the plan as indicated in the CPUState realizefn series is to
> generalize cpu_init() so that it only needs to know which base type to
> operate on. I'm not yet sure how to handle CPU properties in a generic
> way, but said series got three or four targets into a generic QOM'ish
> form already.
Cool.
-- PMM
