On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 04:22:45PM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 3:43 PM, Laszlo Ersek <ler...@redhat.com> wrote: > > Instead, what about > > > > #define endof(container, field) \ > > (offsetof(container, field) + sizeof ((container *)0)->field) > > As mentioned in my reply, I think endof() isn't necessary. > > Just use offsetof() the *next* field or sizeof() the entire struct > (for the last field). That way you let someone else do the dirty > pointer tricks. > > Stefan
Yes but that's very confusing, you need to look at struct order to see what's going on. -- MST
