On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 4:55 PM, Anthony Liguori <aligu...@us.ibm.com> wrote: > Stefan Hajnoczi <stefa...@gmail.com> writes: > >> On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 3:43 PM, Laszlo Ersek <ler...@redhat.com> wrote: >>> Instead, what about >>> >>> #define endof(container, field) \ >>> (offsetof(container, field) + sizeof ((container *)0)->field) >> >> As mentioned in my reply, I think endof() isn't necessary. >> >> Just use offsetof() the *next* field or sizeof() the entire struct >> (for the last field). That way you let someone else do the dirty >> pointer tricks. > > You don't always have a next field so it would get syntactically > awkward.
Use sizeof() the entire struct for the last field. Stefan
