Il 20/02/2013 16:18, Laszlo Ersek ha scritto: >> > I'm beginning to wish I'd just ignored the fact that >> > we need a properly working "soft" reset to get back from 286 protected >> > mode to real mode, and wired up the damn PAM reset unconditionally. I'm >> > not convinced that the protected->real mode transition will work for >> > anyone anyway. > I believe currently we must be somewhere "between" soft reset & hard > reset. I estimate getting closer to a well-emulated hard reset is more > important than getting closer to a soft one. If you were to extend the > i440FX reset handler so that it unconditionally resets the PAMs, I'd > give my Rb. (Take it for what it's worth :))
It would actually make sense. The right way to do soft reset has nothing to do with qemu_system_reset_request(). Paolo