On 25 March 2013 09:47, Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> wrote: > On 25 March 2013 01:01, Peter Crosthwaite <peter.crosthwa...@xilinx.com> > wrote: >> This is the one and only usage of ->realview. I wonder if this >> argument is flawed - in real hardware is there any functional >> difference between realview and versatile PCI requiring the level of >> heirachy defined here? > > Please read the commit message and the later patches in the series :-)
Er, and to be slightly more helpful, the following things differ between versatilepb and realview: * behaviour of IMAP registers * memory window sizes * IRQ mapping and some things we don't yet implement: * SMAP register behaviour * PCI_FLAGS register bits seem to be a little different -- PMM
