On 2 April 2013 15:44, Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> wrote: > This is the case for all supported 64-bits architectures.
Being sensible with the defaults is good, but I wonder if we could structure cpu-defs.h (or somewhere else) so there was a nice clear list of "here are all the things you need to either define for your new target or check that the defaults are sensible". Especially for things like the type alignment it's easy to end up with something that only mostly works if the default isn't correct for you. Or maybe I'm being overoptimistic about whether new target authors would actually check through the list anyway :-) -- PMM
