Am 04.04.2013 11:59, schrieb Igor Mammedov: > On Thu, 04 Apr 2013 11:03:53 +0200 > Andreas Färber <afaer...@suse.de> wrote: > >> Am 21.03.2013 15:28, schrieb Igor Mammedov: >>> ... and define type name and type cast macro for kvmvapic according >>> to accepted convention. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imamm...@redhat.com> >> >> This looks great and a cherry-pick candidate if you agree? > Np, BTW I have a second similar clean-up in v2 for IOAPIC > >> >> Just wondering, was there a name conflict for shorter VAPIC()? >> It's file-local, so doesn't really matter. > Nope, I just followed *_DEVICE model like for SYS_BUS_DEVICE()
Okay, then let's avoid unnecessary _DEVICE in your upcoming resend. The only other place for actual devices where I remember we needed it was to distinguish between PCI host bridge and its PCI device representation on the bus. There is also no "Device" in the struct name. Andreas -- SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746 AG Nürnberg
