On Thu, 04 Apr 2013 12:05:22 +0200 Andreas Färber <afaer...@suse.de> wrote:
> Am 04.04.2013 11:59, schrieb Igor Mammedov: > > On Thu, 04 Apr 2013 11:03:53 +0200 > > Andreas Färber <afaer...@suse.de> wrote: > > > >> Am 21.03.2013 15:28, schrieb Igor Mammedov: > >>> ... and define type name and type cast macro for kvmvapic according > >>> to accepted convention. > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imamm...@redhat.com> > >> > >> This looks great and a cherry-pick candidate if you agree? > > Np, BTW I have a second similar clean-up in v2 for IOAPIC > > > >> > >> Just wondering, was there a name conflict for shorter VAPIC()? > >> It's file-local, so doesn't really matter. > > Nope, I just followed *_DEVICE model like for SYS_BUS_DEVICE() > > Okay, then let's avoid unnecessary _DEVICE in your upcoming resend. The > only other place for actual devices where I remember we needed it was to > distinguish between PCI host bridge and its PCI device representation on > the bus. There is also no "Device" in the struct name. done > > Andreas > > -- > SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany > GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746 AG Nürnberg > -- Regards, Igor
