On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 10:55:04PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 10/28/2009 09:08 PM, Stuart Brady wrote: > >On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 01:50:11AM +0900, TAKEDA, toshiya wrote: > >>+ > >>+/* This version of ay8910.c is a fork of the MAME 0.59 one, relicensed > >>under the LGPL. > > > >Where have you taken this from? > > More exactly, how is this not violating copyright, since MAME's license > is not compatible with anything else (more or less)?
For that matter, fmopl.c in QEMU looks an awful lot like a copyright violation to me: http://www.google.com/codesearch?q=%22This+version+of+fmopl.c%22 Cheers, -- Stuart Brady
