2009/10/29 malc <av1...@comtv.ru>: > On Thu, 29 Oct 2009, Roy Tam wrote: > >> Version 0.37a of fmopl.c/h is relicensed to LGPL by Tatsuyuki >> Satoh(original fmopl developer). >> other versions are not. Especially newer versions by Jarek Burczynski >> as he refused to relicense new fmopl to LGPL. > > The first part is the case, the fmopl.c used by QEMU is the relicensed > LGPL version taken from adplug. As for refusal to relicense newer fmopl > and ymf262 all i can say that my attempts to contact Jarek was > unsuccessful so i don't know his real stance on the subject. >
Even if we don't use fmopl, we can also port dbopl(C++) and/or opl.cpp from dosbox. >> 2009/10/29 Stuart Brady <sdbr...@ntlworld.com>: >> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 10:55:04PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >> >> On 10/28/2009 09:08 PM, Stuart Brady wrote: >> >> >On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 01:50:11AM +0900, TAKEDA, toshiya wrote: >> >> >>+ >> >> >>+/* This version of ay8910.c is a fork of the MAME 0.59 one, relicensed >> >> >>under the LGPL. >> >> > >> >> >Where have you taken this from? >> >> >> >> More exactly, how is this not violating copyright, since MAME's license >> >> is not compatible with anything else (more or less)? >> > >> > For that matter, fmopl.c in QEMU looks an awful lot like a copyright >> > violation to me: >> > >> > http://www.google.com/codesearch?q=%22This+version+of+fmopl.c%22 > > P.S. Please don't top post. > sorry about that. > -- > mailto:av1...@comtv.ru >
