> Il 04/06/2013 22:23, Alon Levy ha scritto:
> > This fixes six instances of unchecked fcntl return status, spotted by
> > Coverity.
> 
> I think we're just assuming that they cannot fail...  I don't think we
> need the previous patch and this one, unless they help porting stuff to
> Windows.

This was purely to satisfy coverity, but I thought we would want to check fcntl 
return status? also, shouldn't we be looping if EINTR?

> 
> Paolo
> 
> 

Reply via email to