Hi Michael, On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 1:29 AM, Michael Tokarev <m...@tls.msk.ru> wrote: > 10.06.2013 19:17, Michael Tokarev пишет: >> 03.06.2013 09:12, peter.crosthwa...@xilinx.com wrote: >>> From: Peter Crosthwaite <peter.crosthwa...@xilinx.com> >>> >>> Some cosmetic fixes to char/serial fixing some checkpatch errors. >> >> These are all cosmetic fixes indeed. I weren't sure we're >> applying stylistic changes by its own. But apparently >> people don't object so I don't see why not, either, except >> that I don't really want to open a can of worms with other >> stylistic patches to come ;) >> >> Applied all 3 to the trivial patches queue. > > Actually I didn't apply these. Since patch 2/3 weren't sent to > -trivial, and 3/3 does not apply without it, I'm not sure I want > to apply either of these. Maybe all 3 should be sent to the same > tree? Should I pick the 2/3 too, which wasn't submitted to > -trivial? >
Im happy for you to take all three as they have had a week of list time and 2/3 is cleanup only with no functional change. It's borderline as to whether its trivial. Regards, Peter > Thank you! > > /mjt > >
