Il 16/07/2013 09:30, Alex Bligh ha scritto: > >> You did. But aio_wait() ignores the timeout. It is only used by the >> main loop. > > OK well that seems worth fixing in any case, as even without timed bh's > that means no bh can be executed for an indeterminate time. I'll have > a look at that.
No, BHs work because they do aio_notify(). Idle BHs can be skipped for an indeterminate time, but that's fine because idle BHs are a hack that we should not need at all. Paolo
