Paolo,
--On 16 July 2013 18:55:15 +0200 Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> wrote:
What do you think? In the end I thought the schedule_bh_at stuff
was simpler.
It is simpler, but I'm not sure it is the right API. Of course, if
Kevin and Stefan says it is, I have no problem with that.
For the sake of having something to comment on, I just sent v3 of this
patch to the list. This is basically a 'minimal change' version that
fixes the issue with aio_poll (I think). It passes make check.
Stefan? Kevin?
--
Alex Bligh
