On 31.07.2013 10:01, Markus Armbruster wrote:
Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> writes:
Most of the block layer is under the BSD license, thus it is reasonable
to license block/raw.c the same way. CCed people should ACK by replying
with a Signed-off-by line.
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <h...@lst.de>
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kw...@redhat.com>
Cc: Anthony Liguori <aligu...@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Markus Armbruster <arm...@redhat.com>
Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefa...@redhat.com>
Cc: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitul...@redhat.com>
Cc: Jeff Cody <jc...@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Lieven <p...@kamp.de>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com>
In general, I very much prefer to protect my work with a strong copyleft
license like the GPLv2+. However, my contributions to raw.c are
trivial, so I choose to go with the flow in this case.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <arm...@redhat.com>
same applies for me.
Signed-off-by: Peter Lieven <p...@kamp.de>
