On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 10:10:18AM +0100, Charlie Shepherd wrote: > >Note that qemu_coroutine_self() in principle really needs to be annotated > >coroutine_fn since it accesses (and returns) its execution context. The fact > >that it is implemented with thread-local variables in Qemu is an > >implementation > >detail, almost a hack (however smart); the "natural" CPC way would be to just > >return the coroutine associated with the current continuation. So keeping the > >annotation definitely makes sense. > > While that would be the natural way, we are going to need the thread > local variables regardless due to the use of the "leader" coroutine > I believe (Stefan is this correct?).
Sure. I was simply pointing out that from a "philosophical" point-of-view, it makes more sense to keep it coroutine_fn. -- Gabriel
