Am 06.09.2013 um 18:05 hat Gabriel Kerneis geschrieben: > On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 04:36:47PM +0100, Charlie Shepherd wrote: > > However, I'm not sure it makes sense to use blocking_fn until the > > convert-block series (which currently needs a respin after Stefan's > > review) is fully upstreamed. Maybe this patch makes most sense at > > the start of that series? > > Yes, definitely, that's why I labeled it RFC rather than PATCH. But if > people agree, it would make much more sense to have the annotations > within your patch series rather than added later (notwithstanding the > fact that it would ease your refactoring effort).
Makes sense to me, go ahead and put it to use. Kevin
