On 15 September 2013 21:25, Michael S. Tsirkin <m...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 06:32:13PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote: >> On 15 September 2013 18:30, Michael S. Tsirkin <m...@redhat.com> wrote: >> > On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 07:16:41PM +0300, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote: >> >> +static const MemoryRegionOps master_abort_mem_ops = { >> >> + .read = master_abort_mem_read, >> >> + .write = master_abort_mem_write, >> >> + .endianness = DEVICE_NATIVE_ENDIAN, >> >> +}; >> >> + >> > >> > Please make it little endian. >> > DEVICE_NATIVE_ENDIAN is almost always a bug. >> >> ...when dealing with PCI devices. For a random device on the system bus >> it's often correct.
> native is really qemu host endian-ness ... what are some > examples when it's actually correct? "native" means "if the device's MMIO callback does 'return 0x12345678;' for a 32 bit read then the guest CPU should see 0x12345678". That's almost always what you want for simple devices (which may in fact only support 32 bit accesses to registers), because it means you don't have to fill your device with explicit endianness swaps. It's also useful if that kind of simple device might be built into either a little endian or a bigendian system: as far as the device is concerned its 32 bit registers still have (say) the TXRDY bit at the low end of the status register even if the CPU is bigendian. That said, our current setup of marking the mmio ops with an endianness is really conflating what in real hardware is a number of distinct properties of the CPU, the bus, any bus controllers (like PCI!) in the path between CPU and device and finally the device itself. So it's inherently both confusing and confused. -- PMM