[Note cc: Andreas] "Michael S. Tsirkin" <m...@redhat.com> writes:
> On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 03:18:27PM +0200, arm...@redhat.com wrote: >> From: Markus Armbruster <arm...@redhat.com> >> >> This gets rid of one of the last get_param_value() users, makes >> multiple -smbios work sanely, cleans up the gross side effect in >> qemu_uuid_parse(), and more. Topped off with a little feature in the >> last patch. >> >> v2: Rebase, only last patch had conflicts > > OK my thinking at this point is: > patches 1-6 are ready > Any objections? > patch 7 - I would prefer some way to explicitly set > default smbios manufacturer/version in machine type > and set these from machine type, instead of > the smbios_type1_defaults boolean. Are you asking for a new QEMUMachine member holding manufacturer (either "Bochs", "QEMU" or null), and new members holding product and version (either null or same value as existing members desc and version, at least now)? Or just for moving smbios_type1_defaults from init function into QEMUMachine? > Would you like > - me to apply 1-6 and keep working on 7? > - wait for you to repost v3? > - look for another maintainer to take patchset as is (if someone > cares to, I won't object)? Waiting for another maintainer after waiting >2 months for *any* maintainer doesn't strike me as a good idea %-} I'm totally fine with you taking just PATCH 1-5. PATCH 6, however, should not be applied without PATCH 7. Andreas doesn't like PATCH 6, and overruling his dislike without an actual use for it (which comes only in PATCH 7) isn't nice.
