On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 09:05:03PM +0900, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 23 September 2013 20:57, Riku Voipio <riku.voi...@iki.fi> wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 07:31:51PM +0200, Stefan Weil wrote: > >> Ping? Are there any more opinions how qemu-sparc64 should be fixed? > >> Should we choose Peter's approach (which is good, but with a > >> higher risk than my patch)? > > > > I've included it now in my qeu, since it fixes qemu-sparc64 in my > > smoketest and causes seemingly no regressions on other platforms. > Yeah, but I bet there are other platforms we're not getting this > right on since the #ifdef here isn't the same as the #ifdef that > decides whether we have a target_stat64 struct or not...
Ok, I'll leave the patch on table then, and send this pullrequest without it. Stefan, can you base the fix on setting TARGET_NO_STRUCT_STAT64 when it is not available? Riku
