On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 12:47:36PM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Could someone with commit rights please stand up to feel responsible for 
> PPC?
>
> Usually, when I send a patch to qemu-devel, I know who to address to  
> increase chances of it getting committed. For kvm/vnc/block I just CC  
> Anthony, for Audio I just CC malc, etc.
>
> There are some subsystems where nobody feels responsible though,  
> apparently hoping 'someone else' will tske on it. Well, turns out it  
> doesn't work that way.
>
> So could we please assign a committer for every subsystem around? Even  
> if the committer doesn't know the architecture inside out, it's still  
> valuable to have soneone feel responsible at all. Committer and  
> maintainer also don't have to be the same person. I'll gladly maintain  
> S390 without having commit rights - as long as I have someone to CC and 
> know the patches will get merged.
>

I also try to follow the ppc architecture, though less than mips and
also depending on my free time. I know that Blue Swirl and Malc also
care about it.

It's not impossible that I miss patches given the current patches rate
on the mailing list, so don't hesitate to Cc: me. On the other hand, I
don't really feel comfortable with KVM related patches, I would prefer
to see them committed by Anthony.

-- 
Aurelien Jarno                          GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
aurel...@aurel32.net                 http://www.aurel32.net


Reply via email to