On Wed, 2 Dec 2009, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 12:47:36PM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Could someone with commit rights please stand up to feel responsible for > > PPC? > > > > Usually, when I send a patch to qemu-devel, I know who to address to > > increase chances of it getting committed. For kvm/vnc/block I just CC > > Anthony, for Audio I just CC malc, etc. > > > > There are some subsystems where nobody feels responsible though, > > apparently hoping 'someone else' will tske on it. Well, turns out it > > doesn't work that way. > > > > So could we please assign a committer for every subsystem around? Even > > if the committer doesn't know the architecture inside out, it's still > > valuable to have soneone feel responsible at all. Committer and > > maintainer also don't have to be the same person. I'll gladly maintain > > S390 without having commit rights - as long as I have someone to CC and > > know the patches will get merged. > > > > I also try to follow the ppc architecture, though less than mips and > also depending on my free time. I know that Blue Swirl and Malc also > care about it.
Just to clarify esp. taking into consideration first paragraph of Alexander's message, i do not care one bit about PPC target (not until Alexander does something magical with PPC64 and i can continue trying to resolve an old Linux's hard lockup issue). I do care about PPC the host though. > > It's not impossible that I miss patches given the current patches rate > on the mailing list, so don't hesitate to Cc: me. On the other hand, I > don't really feel comfortable with KVM related patches, I would prefer > to see them committed by Anthony. > > -- mailto:av1...@comtv.ru