On Wed, 2013-10-02 at 17:21 +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 02/10/2013 14:41, Marcel Apfelbaum ha scritto:
> > +static inline void pci_irq_pulse(PCIDevice *pci_dev)
> > +{
> > + pci_irq_lower(pci_dev);
> > + pci_irq_raise(pci_dev);
> > +}
> > +
>
> Why is this in the opposite order, compared to qemu_irq_pulse?
It is a bug, thank you for catching it!
Marcel> > Paolo
