On Wed, 2009-12-02 at 19:33 +0100, Juan Quintela wrote: > "Michael S. Tsirkin" <m...@redhat.com> wrote: > > No objection to this or similar change with vlans, > > but I'd like to know why was this made a separate buffer > > originally. > > Dunno, either, but I think that this has been always that way. > > commit b6503ed9b8815ecfb82fe9faba28936365321248 was when it was introduced > > Alex, any objection?
No objection. I'd guess it may have been left over from earlier versions when I was thinking the guest could specify a MAC filter table size. Alex
