Am 31.10.2013 15:31, schrieb Peter Maydell: > On 31 October 2013 14:18, Andreas Färber <afaer...@suse.de> wrote: >> Peter, since I had picked up the first two patches into my still pending >> qom-next pull, as per the QEMU Summit discussion those patches should've >> gotten an Acked-by. > > Hmm? I don't recall this part of the discussion. If you want the > patches to have an Acked-by from you you need to send mail > to the list with an Acked-by line.
No, I added a Signed-off-by. It was clearly stated that a Reviewed-by needs to be explicitly sent as reply but that "looks okay" should in exactly such a case where sender=submaintainer should be recorded as Acked-by, and Sob is certainly stronger than Acked-by. Cf. minutes. Andreas -- SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746 AG Nürnberg
