On Monday 30 November 2009, Alexander Graf wrote: > Currently we have this stupid role of disallowing: > > if (r) > break;
This has been discussed to death several times, in several different paces, and with no clear resolution or consensus, so I'm going to make an executive decision: The coding style stays as-is. Braces are required. Please ensure that all patches follow the coding style. There may be exceptions, but there should be a *good* reason for deviation. If there are real problems or ambiguities in the coding style then I am willing to consider fixing it. This particular change meets neither criteria. By picking a single coding style we've pretty much guaranteed that most people will disagree with some of it. IMO consistency is more important. Paul
