On 04.12.2009, at 18:47, Paul Brook wrote: > On Monday 30 November 2009, Alexander Graf wrote: >> Currently we have this stupid role of disallowing: >> >> if (r) >> break; > > This has been discussed to death several times, in several different paces, > and with no clear resolution or consensus, so I'm going to make an executive > decision: > > The coding style stays as-is. Braces are required. Please ensure that all > patches follow the coding style. There may be exceptions, but there should be > a *good* reason for deviation. > > > If there are real problems or ambiguities in the coding style then I am > willing to consider fixing it. This particular change meets neither criteria. > > By picking a single coding style we've pretty much guaranteed that most > people > will disagree with some of it. IMO consistency is more important.
Could we please convert all the code base to the new style then? For exactly the consistency reason. Alex
