On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 10:04 PM, Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> wrote: > On 2 December 2013 07:10, Peter Crosthwaite > <peter.crosthwa...@xilinx.com> wrote: >> This has no real hardware analog. Leave the error message in is as >> it is almost certainly a guest error, but fallthrough to the expected >> behaviour. > > Maybe we should qemu_log_mask(LOG_GUEST_ERROR, ...) then? >
I'm starting to think this is not a peripherals assumption to make. Theres nothing in the GEM design that suggests a 0 RX buffer address is functionally incorrect. Its not good for Zynq, as theres an ARM vector table there but thats Zynq's problem not GEMs. Peripherals DMAing to non-sensical addresses is a SoC/Board level problem and I think it should be solved there. I'm just going to delete this whole check. Regards, Peter
