On 12/17/2013 05:26 PM, Juan Quintela wrote:
This operation is way faster than doing it bit by bit.

Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quint...@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <ebl...@redhat.com>
---
  include/exec/memory-internal.h | 16 ++++++----------
  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/exec/memory-internal.h b/include/exec/memory-internal.h
index c04a92a..b017c2e 100644
--- a/include/exec/memory-internal.h
+++ b/include/exec/memory-internal.h
@@ -44,19 +44,15 @@ static inline bool cpu_physical_memory_get_dirty(ram_addr_t 
start,
                                                   ram_addr_t length,
                                                   unsigned client)
  {
-    ram_addr_t addr, end;
+    unsigned long end, page, next;

      assert(client < DIRTY_MEMORY_NUM);

-    end = TARGET_PAGE_ALIGN(start + length);
-    start &= TARGET_PAGE_MASK;
-    for (addr = start; addr < end; addr += TARGET_PAGE_SIZE) {
-        if (test_bit(addr >> TARGET_PAGE_BITS,
-                     ram_list.dirty_memory[client])) {
-            return true;
-        }
-    }
-    return false;
+    end = TARGET_PAGE_ALIGN(start + length) >> TARGET_PAGE_BITS;
+    page = start >> TARGET_PAGE_BITS;
+    next = find_next_bit(ram_list.dirty_memory[client], end, page);
+
+    return next < end;
  }

  static inline bool cpu_physical_memory_get_dirty_flag(ram_addr_t addr,


Reviewed-by: Orit Wasserman <owass...@redhat.com>


Reply via email to