Am 23.01.2014 16:40, schrieb Peter Maydell: > On 23 January 2014 14:41, Andreas Färber <afaer...@suse.de> wrote: >> As indicated on IRC, I want to get those fixed before transforming one >> notation to another. Especially this patch is throwing them all in one >> bucket dropping any annotation hinting at why and how it may be fixed. > > Would you accept a version where every item on the black list > had a comment describing why it was there and what the required > fix is? I think this patch is a vast improvement on the current > whitelist setup and we shouldn't block it waiting for every > obscure target to get fixed.
Like I said, I have already sent a patch for PReP, which Alex has queued. The intent is to rebase this series on it, obsoleting part of the blacklist. I have also now sent out a patch covering Macs and e500. So the answer is, I will accept a patch that has a reasonably small blacklist. The time you're arguing about this on IRC and here you could've spent actually helping investigate and fixing this... Even if I queued it and sent a pull, it would take days or weeks to go in, so I really don't see why I should rush this series into my tree. Andreas -- SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746 AG Nürnberg
