First of all, sorry for snipping the technical parts. You made good
points, but I think the actual problem is not technical. We should
first sort out the social part.
Il 09/02/2014 02:41, Andreas Färber ha scritto:
Similarly I feel that you have given quite some destructive feedback to
my favorite series
The only one I can think of is recursive realization, and that's because
I'm absolutely not sure of the way to do it. It's not destructive
feedback, it's "are you sure it's the right way? Because I don't even
know _what_ is right".
the last few months, not clearly stating how you want
things done instead. If you're jealous that you didn't make top 1 at KVM
Forum 2013
Are you serious?!?
you have lots of chances to catch up for 2.0 rather than being
unfriendly to me and obstructive to my line of work.
FWIW, picking up obvious KVM-ish patches is not being unfriendly, it's
trying to be helpful. If you haven't reviewed a patch for 3 months it
obviously means that you were busy.
I don't personally consider such statistics telling.
Me neither, FWIW.
Paolo
