This is the product of the data-width and the depth arguments, I.e the
depth of the FIFO is in terms of data entries and not bytes (which is
what the original implementation was suggesting). Fix.
Signed-off-by: Peter Crosthwaite <peter.crosthwa...@xilinx.com>
---
hw/dma/pl330.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/hw/dma/pl330.c b/hw/dma/pl330.c
index 303f8b8..fe437cb 100644
--- a/hw/dma/pl330.c
+++ b/hw/dma/pl330.c
@@ -1606,7 +1606,7 @@ static void pl330_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
pl330_queue_init(&s->read_queue, s->rd_q_dep, s);
pl330_queue_init(&s->write_queue, s->wr_q_dep, s);
- pl330_fifo_init(&s->fifo, s->data_buffer_dep);
+ pl330_fifo_init(&s->fifo, s->data_width / 4 * s->data_buffer_dep);
}
static Property pl330_properties[] = {
--
1.8.5.4
