On 11 February 2014 06:31, Peter Crosthwaite <peter.crosthwa...@xilinx.com> wrote: > This is the product of the data-width and the depth arguments, I.e the > depth of the FIFO is in terms of data entries and not bytes (which is > what the original implementation was suggesting). Fix. > > Signed-off-by: Peter Crosthwaite <peter.crosthwa...@xilinx.com> > --- > > hw/dma/pl330.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/hw/dma/pl330.c b/hw/dma/pl330.c > index 303f8b8..fe437cb 100644 > --- a/hw/dma/pl330.c > +++ b/hw/dma/pl330.c > @@ -1606,7 +1606,7 @@ static void pl330_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error > **errp) > > pl330_queue_init(&s->read_queue, s->rd_q_dep, s); > pl330_queue_init(&s->write_queue, s->wr_q_dep, s); > - pl330_fifo_init(&s->fifo, s->data_buffer_dep); > + pl330_fifo_init(&s->fifo, s->data_width / 4 * s->data_buffer_dep);
Stray double space after '4'. -- PMM
